Strategy
QA Outsourcing Cost Guide 2025: Playwright, Cypress, Selenium
December 12, 2025
9 min read
💰
Why costs vary so much
Automation costs swing based on framework choice, runtime efficiency, and maintenance. Playwright and Cypress often deliver lower flake and maintenance costs than legacy Selenium when suites are designed well.
Core cost buckets
- Build: Framework setup, patterns, and pipelines
- Run: CI minutes, parallelization, and test selection
- Fix: Flake stabilization and selector maintenance
- Expand: New coverage and data/env work
Benchmarks (weekly suites)
- Playwright: $3.5k–$5.5k/mo infra at medium scale, low flake with auto-waits
- Cypress: $4k–$6k/mo with Dashboard parallelization; great DX, JS-only
- Selenium: $5k–$8k/mo infra + higher maint if selectors are brittle
Hidden costs to model
- Flake tax: every 1% flake adds hours of reruns and triage
- Data/env drift: stale fixtures and test data collisions
- Slow regressions: >45m suites delay releases and pile up risk
How to budget
Model people + infra + maintenance. Aim for <30m regression with parallelism and smart test selection. Track change-fail rate, flake rate, and coverage as leading indicators.
Engagement models
- Pilot (2–4 weeks): Spike frameworks, deliver 1–2 flows, prove runtime/flake targets
- Build (6–10 weeks): Stand up CI pipelines, data strategy, and core suite
- Run (retainer): Expand coverage, keep flake <2%, tune infra cost
Tip: fix flake and data before expanding coverage—speed and trust beat raw test count.
Need Expert Testing Services?
Let ZeroBugLab help you implement these strategies in your projects. Our team of testing experts can guide you through modern testing practices and automation.
Get in TouchGet monthly QA benchmarks
Subscribe for playbooks, tooling breakdowns, and release-health benchmarks. One email per month.
Subscribe to newsletter